Pages

categories

Authors

Tuesday, April 19, 2011

Funny People

In light of our casting pods at the tv vs film issue on the most recent Podcast Of Love I have elected to waste my virgin Naked Crusaders blog entry on reprinting an old blog of mine that explores this subject in then real time. Then time. Better than real time because it was then. I wrote this in the exciting then-ness of life right after I had seen Pineapple Express and shortly after seeing Tropic Thunder. I even reference Brandon, though not by name. So it comes full circle. And it goes something like this...

...Two fairly hyped comedies have come out the past week. Both were pretty well reviewed as these things go. I speak of Pineapple Express and Tropic Thunder. I’ve seen them both. And I have to say, if, as has been put forth by writers of greater acclaim than I (meaning they were acclaimed at all), these are the funniest movies of the past year, I think it is no wonder I don’t laugh much anymore.

THis should probably make me feel good. I was worried my life had stripped me of whatever receptivity to humor as well as ability to engender laughter I had. But maybe it’s not me. Maybe there just really isn’t anything all that funny out there. If this is the apex than Sweet Bloody Christ On A Stick we’re an unfunny people.

I guess it’s possible the worrying about the decaying of my own sense of humor and wit could be responsible for not thinking these movies are brilliant comedies. But I still think I have some review chops and good instincts left over even if I lack the hope, meaning, and purpose that used to drive them. And these aren’t great movies. And judging by the crowds I saw them with I wasn’t the only one not prostrate with guffaws.

And if you’ve ever been prostrated by a case of the guffaws you know what a bittersweet affliction this can be.

Now neither of these flicks was horrid. Pineapple Express is a stoner comedy from the Freaks And Geeks alumni associated with Judd Apatow. It’s in that vain. Apatow’s movie’s themselves have been acclaimed as the great comedies of our time. They are supposedly this generation’s John Hughes.

If so I weep for the future.

That’s a line from a Hughes movie by the way. If 10 people read this maybe 3 will have known that. If they are under 30 probably none of them will.

But who cares? Life moves on. Moves pretty fast even. If you don't stop and take a look you just might miss something and all that. Fine. But still if these movies are someday looked at as the Breakfast Clubs or Ferris Bueller’s of their time I gotta think we’re missing something and great comedy can now only be found on You Tube and Fox News.

And perhaps at the Country Music Awards.

Seriously, just the idea of it. Awards for the best Country music!

Shit that’s funny stuff.

Anyhow, Apatow’s Superbad was very well thought of last year along with Knocked Up. Both were ok. Really, really ok. But Knocked Up was pretty boring upon a second viewing on cable recently. And Superbad rarely prostrated me. It was a mostly guffawless experience even if a modestly pleasant one. It’s pleasantness I suspect was mostly due to Michael Cera who kicks all kinds of ass and who deserves to fuck every starlet in Hollywood starting with Megan Fox whom he should impregnate and then force to give the baby up to Angelina Jolie in return for Cera letting Jolie fuck him too. Because Michael Cera should violate every starlette in Hollywood and leaving them a quivering mass of ruined flesh. Because that's his nature.

Speaking of him, Juno even got an Oscar bid. Solid movie. Labeled a comedy. But again, not especially a prostrating experience. Same goes of those I watched it with in a theater in Rheinbeck. And if anyone knows comedy it’s the 6 figure salaried folks of Rhinebeck god damn it! I mean their Hannaford is so freaking clean and stately it’s got to be some kind wry ironic joke. These are a gifted people. And yet there were only appreciative chuckles.

Chuckles i say!

And I don't say chuckles often.

But I heard Juno talked of as a Say Anything for this generation. And I could kind of see that. But I still couldn’t help thinking this is sad. Say Anything wasn’t hilarious but it’s eternally quotable. Will youngsters today be quoting Juno 20 years from now? Probably not. They’ll have their work cut out for them just keeping track of all Michael Cera’s love children as they start coming of age and impregnating starlets at an exponential rate that future mathematicians will have to come up with a formula to track. This formula will feature the critical equation MC= S x F squared where MC is Michael Cera and S and F starlets and fucking that Cera has done.

Squared.

And at a velocity to be determined by his mass at the time.

If you know what I mean.

Anyway, back to recent well received comedies. I saw the first Harold And Kumar movie recently. Netflixed it.

With all these recent comedy viewings of mine you can probably tell by now that I have been pretty desperate to find something to laugh about here. And laugh I did. Occasionally. And decidedly without prostration.

When the fuck is someone going to do something for my prostrating needs!?

But the White Castle movie was still pretty damn formulaic and the humor nothing all that special. And yet it, along with the aforementioned comedies are highly thought of. At least for their time. So that’s why I wonder if we’re in unfunny times and if that’s contributing to my inability to form a smile.

Anyway I will touch on the Tropic Thunder controversy and say that protesters, and this includes my old sometimes current per diemey agency UG-ARC (as I found out tonight from a friend who works there), are really a bunch of whiny ass liberals without any sense of humor.

Now this may sound hypocritical in light of the previous passages of this post as well as my own ill formed attempts at humor in said post. But these people haven’t even seen the movie. It’s really not taking shots at retarded people. It’s making fun of Tom Hanks, Dustin Hoffman, and all the other pretty boy actors who turn in sugar coated version of the mentally retarded that have little to do with reality. But of course ours is a culture that deals in reality the way a cat deals with a mouse: pounce on it, kill it, consume the evidence and call it a meal.

Or something more analogous.

People don’t want truth and Hollywood is glad to not give it to them.

But some of these self involved do-gooders want to sway people from seeing a movie because they’re more liberal about retarded people now than about free speech. The Simple Jack and whole “full retard,” segment was one of the few truly funny and observant aspects of the movie and these idiots want it removed!

So is it all me or are we dispossessing ourselves of real humor? Did Carlin take it with him? Fuck, even he wasn’t always that funny. But he prostrated me at times and damn it what more can one man ask of another?

Back to retarded people: I frakking work with these people. Manage a program of 10 of them. I truly care for some of these guys. Have affection for them even. And the “full retard,” segment with Robert Downey Jr and Ben Stiller rang true and was damn straight on funny. Also echoed things I’ve said about Hollywood depictions of the mentally disabled.

And let me just say this now that I bring him up: Robert Downey Jr is the most watchable actor in film. Bar none. He rocks. Without him this movie would have been a total waste of time. The other great moment came with his, “For 400 hundred years,” speech to the other black actor, an actor probably destined to be known as that other black actor despite being the only black actor. This in itself is a bit of genius that redeems a movie that needed more funny and less blowing things up.

Speaking of good parts. Pineapple Express’s crucifixion joint was pretty funny. So was “Fuck Jeff Goldblum.” A few other things as well, but this still wasn’t as good as an episode of Freaks And Geeks of which this could have been a mini reunion with just the two freaks Rogen and Franco getting together and possibly not remembering that they hung out together in school and had a band before one became a seller of weed and the other a process server who smokes a lot of it.

But is was ok. And that seems to be good enough today. I’m ok, you’re ok, we’re all ok. But I don’t feel ok and though I’m not prepared to blame this on Seth Rogen or Ben Stiller, or even that Kumar fellow who was a terrorist on 24, I am serving notice.

But back to the greatness of Robert Downey Jr. In a recent interview he had the following to say about The Dark Knight:

“My whole thing is that that I saw ‘The Dark Knight’. I feel like I’m dumb because I feel like I don’t get how many things that are so smart. It’s like a Ferrari engine of storytelling and script writing and I’m like, ‘That’s not my idea of what I want to see in a movie.’ I loved ‘The Prestige’ but didn’t understand ‘The Dark Knight’. Didn’t get it, still can’t tell you what happened in the movie, what happened to the character and in the end they need him to be a bad guy. I’m like, ‘I get it. This is so high brow and so f–king smart, I clearly need a college education to understand this movie.’ You know what? F-ck DC comics. That’s all I have to say and that’s where I’m really coming from.”

Agree or disagree this guy is awesome and should have lots of babies. IF he were a woman he would be a perfect genetic incubator for Michael Cera DNA. But he, at the last, is a man. And a magnificent one who must merely stand side by side with Cera as sexual avatars of our humorless age.

And with Entourage about to start it’s 5th season next month it occurs to me that Jeremy Piven as Ari should be Michael Cera’s agent and help sign him to lucrative deals to fuck and impregnate starlets. Because that’s what Michael Cera needs to do and Ari would understand this and get it done. If you take nothing from this post let it be this that you take the least of: Michael Cera is too much man for Hollywood to contain for long. His seed is a the seed of the ages and it must be spread by the best and hottest women celebrity has to offer us.

6 comments:

  1. I read this originally and can not remember what I thought then. But I have an opinion now. You made many points and I will respond in no particular order. As far as the comedies of today existing at a lower standard than the comedies of the John Hughes era I stand in defense of modern comedy. Your dad thought the Broderick films were nothing compared to the Jack Lemmon days. And when it comes down to it who is quoting Say Anything? I loved that movie. But my laughter rarely surpassed a whisper. I want to know if there were shitty comedies in the 80's? There are good and bad films in any genre in any era. Funny is funny but exists on a wavelength. Crap today is stool crap compared to greatness of any era. If you want a film to jump start your funny switch than get the right film.

    As far as Robert Downey Jr. Fuck him. If you don't believe in funny I don't believe in second chances. He reached for mediocre 20 years ago and got handed another chance. But what does he repay us with? He craps genre crap one after another. Tropic Thunder, Iron Man, Due Date, Sherlock Homes. The soloist dug deeper but not enough to strike gold. If he is so amazing I want him to stop paying with credit and starting backing it up with cash money. Mickey Rourke had a comeback, Downey needs his Wrestler.

    Superbad was terrible.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I have changed opinion on rdj since that original post. He has since become a caricature. Iron man 2 was unwatchable.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I take offense at the notion that I'm the typically self absorbed person whose opinions about the past suffer from generational myopia. Right or wrong my assertion that films of that type were funnier way back when are due to analysis. Not silly mind games. No one is more aware and on guard against such stupid human tricks.

    But when you infer that my Say Anything vs Juno opinion is the stuff of old fogey folklore you seem to have misread something. First off i never said Say Anything was funny. So I don't disagree with your whisper comment. But sorry, it is still being quoted. That perhaps IS a generational thing. people in their twenties today would not be quoting it. Of course. My point was that i don't think those people will be quoting Juno twenty years from now either. I'd bet on it.

    ReplyDelete
  4. And I do believe in funny. I believe it is just found more often on tv than movies. This was the original point relating to the podcast discussion. You make a point about the 80's having bad movies too. and you could say the same about tv and conclude that i'm being selective. I'm not. Of course the majority of any genre at any time its mostly crap or at best forgettable. My larger assertion is that there were SOME classics then. im not sure there are now.

    The funny is out there today. I just wouldn't look for it in a movie theater.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I didn't mean to offend but I think the entire notion of movies being funnier back then is nostalgic. And we are both being selective. The drudge that passes as comedy on TV is as bad as the drudge that passes as comedie on film. But I am worried about this developing Say Anything/Juno discussion. Ostensibly we are on the same Paige? Seriously, Say Anything has more of a timeless quality and is admittedly more quotable, and represents the classics of the era. Juno, the uncomedy on the other hand is forgettable. It did usher in the teen pregnancy craze that dominates your blessed TV as well as the underwhelming Michael Cera swill, but all in all forgettable. So how are we on the same page? It's about the high and low tide of decent genre flicks of any era, choosing the correct comedy and not comparing apples to oranges. I do not disagree with the assertion that Hollywood rolls out more garbage than not that has the effect of me questioning my sense of humor. I just think you should step back, widen your scope and take a more comprehensive test of the comedy waters instead of 'selecting' two titles that happen to be shitty and flushing the toilet on a generation of films.

    My final thought; we revisit this in another 20 years. I predict one comedy will come out as the one from the new millennium as the generational classic. Not sure which but it will prove the fickle minds of critics more cyclical than we realize.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Well I selected two titles because when i wrote that I had seen both in theaters that week. It's not like those are the only comedies of recent vintage I've seen. But I wouldn't have reposted it if I'd thought anything since had altered my perceptions on the topic. I'm not going to spend time analyzing every Judd Apatow film without getting paid.

    I still disagree on the 20 year cycle. But regardless of whether good and original comedies will be made or if anything current will hold up, I have a feeling that due to the fragmented nature of entertainment few works of art in any area will do more than meet a niche market need or have universal appeal to hold up as a generational classic.

    As a culture more and more people seek out an echo chamber and there are more and more venues willing to provide them their narrow focus and tell them what they want to hear. The internet narrows the world for us even as it broadens it. And with so much out there to feed our senses does anything stick to us?

    So i'm just not sure anything will exist on that level of shared greatness anymore. We're specialists now. And we seek out specialized comforts in opinion, entertainment or whatever. And then find our small chat room of the like minded where we get no rebuttal.

    And by we, I mean, like, the royal WE, man.

    ReplyDelete